Previously on “you wake up and you realize…” I discussed the three likely paths (well, i mentioned an unlikely first path, bringing the total to four) that the US could take in regards to the debt ceiling issue.
Regardless of what path is taken, people will have less confidence in the government on economic and fiscal issues than before. That is really really bad. Our economy relies on a sane and sound government. We also rely on government spending. We rely on having regulation to protect us (think how fortunate you are to not have to investigate the provenance of every bit of food you eat – the FDA and USDA do that for you!) we rely on the government to gather money for large, necessary projects (like, collecting taxes to pay for road building. think how hard that would be to do on your own, every day).
Worst case scenario (mind, ignoring the one which I cannot comprehend) the government doesn’t reach a deal and has to stop paying bills. Well, with no government spending a lot of money stops flowing into the economy. Some businesses will be fine, for a little while, but work will have to stop in some places and investment will have to slow in others. The less spending going around the less movement in the economy. More people lose jobs. Just imagine all of the companies in the US running out of money to develop new products and running out of customers to buy the old ones – that would be pretty terrible.
The less bad situations would be just a massive loss in confidence everywhere. If we can’t expect politicians to get anything done, then how can we plan for the future? For this, just imagine all of the companies in the US realizing that they have no clue what is going to happen the next day, or quarter, or year.
So, we have the possibility of another economic crisis upcoming. If interest rates go haywire, the financial sector will take some hits, maybe a couple of banks that are too much on the wrong side of the wrong bets will collapse. Things might get weird.
Last time this happened, it was the result of a complicated mass of actions. People who couldn’t afford houses bought them, but they were encouraged by fee seeking mortgage sellers, who were made possible (profitable?) by banks packaging mortgages and selling them on, who could do that very profitably because ratings agencies missed out some important assumptions in their models, which made those packages appealing to large investors and hedge funds, whose clients, including university and charity endowments demanded higher and higher returns for lower and lower expected risk. But nobody wants to blame Yale for the financial crisis, that doesn’t even make sense.
This time however, it is pretty clear where responsibility lies. If politicians cannot get together and make sure that the government pays its bills, or they act in such a manner that everyone completely loses faith in them (if you think you have already lost faith in the US Government, just wait until next Wednesday) it will be rather clear who is responsible for this mess. There are clear solutions, palatable or not.
Posted by jrtaff