From Senatobia, take highway 4 east to gravel springs road, go south to O B McClinton road and take a left. Within a mile, you will see the cars lining up on the street and neighbors renting out their driveways and yards for $3-5 per parking spot. The marching band, consisting of up to two snare drums and three bass drums led by a fife, marks the Turner family homestead. Two dollars gets you a long night of food and music. This is the Otha Turner Memorial picnic, started by the late Otha Turner in the 1950′s as a labor day goat barbecue, it is now an open barbecue and blues party.
Some little girls were dancing around as we arrived:

We walked around the house to the back yard, which had been transformed into the perfect venue for a blues show. An open shed had a menu posted which revealed that a barbecue goat sandwich could be had for only $3.50, pork was $3 and pickled eggs only fifty cents. The goat sandwich was excellent: thick white bread, plenty of sauce, and delicious meat. A trailer directly behind the house held the huge barbecue smoker where freshly cooked meat was being kept warm. As people came in, the chef at the barbecue snuck out some tender ribs and offered them to whoever was standing around.
This is who you sneak ribs from:

A tractor trailer was set up with a stage in the back of the yard, blocking view of the horse pen. One of the Turner women shouted out for the Burnsides, who seemed to be running a bit late. A young man who was enjoying the festivities thoroughly took it upon himself to climb on stage and assure the crowd that the music would start soon “Its definitely gonna jump off soon, and because you had to wait, we gonna make it real good.” He made a number of these announcements in only a few minutes before a blues guitarist came sat down on stage, flanked by Dexter and Garry Burnside, who supplied the drum and bass guitar for the performance.
The picnic drew one of the most diverse crowds I have seen at a musical event in Mississippi. Some elderly ladies and gentlemen from the Turner family sat on a bench near the food shed. Country neighbors were joined by young people of all description from the city. Red-necked men stood next to borderline hipsters. People from Memphis, Jackson and Compton swayed to the music alongside everyone else.
It got packed later in the night, but there were plenty of people gathering at the shack early on.

In between each artist, the marching band would strike up. The fife sometimes just seemed erratic, but made for an entertaining set. The people behind the instruments was always changing, sometimes a drum would be played by someone from the crowd. The snare drummers held their drums sideways and played casually, while the bass drums would dance around, putting on a show. Throughout the whole night, the drumline was excellent. When they started playing, the crowd would rush from the stage to surround them tightly. People closest would always dance while everyone else angled for a better view. The band often got so caught up in playing that they could not hear the calls for them to get back to the stage to kick off another set – they had to be physically pulled and pushed at least once to get them to the front.
Throughout the evening, a number of artists came to the stage, always supported by some member(s) of the prodigious Burnside clan. Otha’s sixteen year old granddaughter Sharde came on stage late in the night for a few songs, including an amazing fife rendition of ‘Ride Sally Ride.” Sharde was an excellent fife player, and it was announced (i think) that she has a CD on the way. R.L. Burnside Jr. turned up on stage to play “just one song.” It turned out that he had another song he wanted to play, before he played one last song. That last song was followed by several other last songs before one of the Turner women tried to kick him off stage. He played one more song after that. His trademark seemed to be just that – one more song.
It is really impossible to do justice to the experience in a blog post. The only lighting was a partially clouded moon and a single street light in the middle of the yard. 200 speed film and a no-flash philosophy don’t turn out good pictures in these conditions. The displayed pictures were taken on E’s digital. It was a wonderful experience, capped off with camping below the Sardis Dam.
For a video of Sharde, Otha and the Rising Star Drum Band in the Turner’s back yard, check this video. This is what happens as people arrive, but they dont park in the back yard anymore.
For a full recorded song:
Posted by jrtaff 





In defense of a hero. Governor William Winter.
November 17, 2010I have said before that Governor William Winter is a hero of mine. Any politician serious about education can win my vote. My dads high regard for Governor Winter forms the roots of my admiration of the governor whose name is on the State Archives building. It is this bias that caused me to investigate further when I found an editorial in the Clarion Ledger claiming that he was ‘demonizing the right.’ What a crude thing to say about such a great person.
Andy Taggart was apparently shocked by a quote of Governor Winter’s in an earlier article. He calls the quotes “really outlandish” and states his disagreement. I find his assertions quite outlandish myself, and like him feel that “his remarks … should not be allowed to go unchallenged.”
This first instance appears to be a classic case of a quote taken out of context. Governor Winter did indeed compare “the mindset of the tea party movement of 2010 to that of the segregationists of the 1960′s.” It is the next sentence in which Taggart goes completely off the mark. Taggart says that Governor Winter was suggesting that “people in the tea party are just not willing to recognize the rights of others.” However, if one were to read the entire quote, it would be obvious that it is a refusal to compromise that is linking the two mindsets. Governor Winter does not say anything about denying people rights, Taggart is the only one making this insinuation.
This is an appropriate comparison, it seems, as House Minority Leader John Boehner said himself “This is not a time for compromise.” So Governor Winter is comparing the mindset of people who would not compromise to the mindset of people who say they will not compromise. Sounds pretty fitting to me.
One could still say that it might be a bit insensitive to compare people in the Tea Party to segregationists (as this clearly offends the sensitivities of Mr. Taggart). One might ask, why would Governor Winter make that particular comparison, why not compare it to a more recent example of Democrats and Republicans refusing to compromise? Well, we have to look no further than the same quote from Governor Winter “When I ran for governor in 1967, anyone who suggested a compromise toward desegregation just couldn’t win.” There is your answer. Governor Winter suggested that comparison because it was incredibly relevant to his experience running for… Governor. We don’t call him Governor Winter for nothing, after all.
Mr. Taggart should be ashamed of taking that quote even slightly out of context. He should be doubly ashamed of insinuating that such a respectable statesman as Governor Winter was only trying to denigrate those who did not hold his opinion.
Taggart next takes umbrage with this quote: “We had a civil war in the middle of the 19th century because we couldn’t compromise.” Here Governor Winter is putting a little dramatic illustration to what can happen when people don’t compromise (see also the 1995 Federal Government shutdown as a less dramatic example). This could be taken as a statement of fact. We probably all agree that there was a civil war in the middle of the 19th century. It is fairly clear that this war was the result of some problem in between two groups, neither of which would budge enough to come to mutual agreement. This is pretty much the definition of “not compromising” seeing as a compromise is generally an agreement reached when both parties make concessions. Unless Taggart believes that war was the concession that both sides made, then we should all be able to accept that Governor Winter was making a pretty uncontroversial statement of fact.
I see that Taggart is shocked that one can compromise on the issue of slavery. “Really, Governor? Where is it, exactly, that one compromises on the issue of slavery?” Well, Taggart, there are a lot of places that one could have compromised on the subject of slavery. Of course, from the perspective of 2010, this does sound ridiculous, after all, we do not have slavery here in the United States. To say that we should “compromise” on the issue is absolutely ridiculous. I am sure that Taggart is saying “there is no compromise on slavery – we simply do not have it.” And he is exactly right, in 2010.
But we must keep in mind that Governor Winter was not talking about 2010. He was talking about “the middle of the 19th century.” That was a time when there was slavery. There were, in fact, compromises on slavery up until that time when “had a civil war … because we couldn’t compromise.” Starting with the 3/5s compromise in the constitution, continuing to the Missouri Compromise, and then the slavery compromises in 1850. These were all compromises revolving around the issue of slavery. If Mr. Taggart is unfamiliar with the history of the civil war, I can recommend a few excellent teachers of high school history who could probably fill him in.
I am not saying that we should have kept on compromising over slavery and maintained that peculiar institution any longer – I am simply saying that it was a failure to agree, a failure to compromise which led to the civil war. (I do not speak for Governor Winter, but I do not think that he supports slavery either). This shouldn’t be controversial at all. Governor Winter made a statement of fact about the civil war, which Taggart seems to have felt indicated that Governor WInter thought the end of slavery was a bad thing. There is no element of opinion in that statement, any conclusion drawn from that about Governor Winters opinion is purely speculative.
Taggart then claims that Democrats plan to compare Conservatives to people who caused the civil war. Well, that sounds pretty silly, but we shall see.
Mr Taggart was correct though, there were some “really outlandish comments” that “should not be allowed to go unchallenged.” (You can check out the original post to see how nicely these out of context quotes go together).
In the interest of keeping this post shorter than it could be, I’ll reserve all that excitement for the next post. Coming in a few minutes.